Many people are considering investing or adopting in an emerging low-carbon explanation in the market region, so as to save the environment and the money as well. But, we are also waiting for that ideal piece of innovation or technology that is certainly going to provide our money's worth.
Sadly, according to some scientists, this fantasy solution is not actually coming in any moment. Moreover, according to the cutting-edge study, we are all lost out on the money-saving, green chances that are presently in the market.
Base on what Mac Dowell and his group states; that the strategy of 'Goldilocks' have two main drawbacks:
First, it may come from a considerable failure to transport to greener, newer solutions, thus making sure that the carbon-emission targets were never met.
Next, the concept can lead to the solution wherein emerging or existing solutions, included those that are using fossil fuels were perpetuated, in more diffuse volumes, bigger, over time, to balance for the increasing standard industrial and residential power needs. In the situation, de-carbonization aim can be met but with an expense of the systems with an extreme redundancy.
Researchers clarifies why this ‘Goldilocks’ strategy, example like the waiting for the completely ideal solution, will not be the appropriate approach in achieving this ‘greener’ technology.
Sadly, according to some scientists, this fantasy solution is not actually coming in any moment. Moreover, according to the cutting-edge study, we are all lost out on the money-saving, green chances that are presently in the market.
Base on what Mac Dowell and his group states; that the strategy of 'Goldilocks' have two main drawbacks:
First, it may come from a considerable failure to transport to greener, newer solutions, thus making sure that the carbon-emission targets were never met.
Next, the concept can lead to the solution wherein emerging or existing solutions, included those that are using fossil fuels were perpetuated, in more diffuse volumes, bigger, over time, to balance for the increasing standard industrial and residential power needs. In the situation, de-carbonization aim can be met but with an expense of the systems with an extreme redundancy.
Researchers clarifies why this ‘Goldilocks’ strategy, example like the waiting for the completely ideal solution, will not be the appropriate approach in achieving this ‘greener’ technology.
Low-carbon power, (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved June 30, 2018, from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-carbon_power
LSE. March 2014. What is “decarbonisation” of the power sector? Why do we need to decarbonise the power sector in the UK?. [ONLINE] Available at: lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/faqs/what-is-decarbonisation-of-the-power-sector-why-do-we-need-to-decarbonise-the-power-sector-in-the-uk/.
Evolving Science. May 2018. Green Tech: Don’t Wait For ‘Goldilocks’ Product, Say Researchers. [ONLINE] Available at: evolving-science.com/matter-energy/green-tech-goldilocks-product-researchers-00669
LSE. March 2014. What is “decarbonisation” of the power sector? Why do we need to decarbonise the power sector in the UK?. [ONLINE] Available at: lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/faqs/what-is-decarbonisation-of-the-power-sector-why-do-we-need-to-decarbonise-the-power-sector-in-the-uk/.
Evolving Science. May 2018. Green Tech: Don’t Wait For ‘Goldilocks’ Product, Say Researchers. [ONLINE] Available at: evolving-science.com/matter-energy/green-tech-goldilocks-product-researchers-00669